There is also a nice discussion and possibly a very detailed answer to the exact question posted above, in paper by Pons, as well as in Sundermeyer 's book " Symmetries in Fundamental Physics ". The bottom line is: isolated first class constraints (primary or secondary or tertiary...) do not, in general, generate gauge transformations.
In the past, after Fleischmann and Pons announced their cold fusion results, in perfectly good faith, they were proven wrong by subsequent experiments. What are the experimental realities that make Fleischmann and Pons style cold fusions experiments easy to get wrong? Would the same risks apply to this new set up?
Pons and Fleischmann and McKubre did electrolysis, and noticed excess heat and correlated He production. Bocris measured large amounts of tritium production (and was accused of scientific misconduct for this, and exonerated), as did others in contact with Miley.
I can't seem to understand why charge accumulates on the sharp points on a conductors surface. I've seen many solutions with math's but I don't understand them and I want a more intuitive explanati...
Yes, but I was trying to find the absolute entropy (like the one in the Boltzmann definition), not the Δ. So I thought to do this. Once we know that ΔS=Cln (T2/T1) we can split everything S2-S1=Cln (T2)-Cln (T1) and call S (n)=Cln (T (n)). I don't understand why I can't do it. Thanks
Don't believe the naysayers that say Keshe technology can't be done...there are plenty who have already done it! Look up Joseph Papp, Stanley Meyer, Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann, as examples of some of those who have worked with plasma or LENR.