In the past, after Fleischmann and Pons announced their cold fusion results, in perfectly good faith, they were proven wrong by subsequent experiments. What are the experimental realities that make Fleischmann and Pons style cold fusions experiments easy to get wrong? Would the same risks apply to this new set up?
Pons and Fleischmann and McKubre did electrolysis, and noticed excess heat and correlated He production. Bocris measured large amounts of tritium production (and was accused of scientific misconduct for this, and exonerated), as did others in contact with Miley.
There is also a nice discussion and possibly a very detailed answer to the exact question posted above, in paper by Pons, as well as in Sundermeyer 's book " Symmetries in Fundamental Physics ". The bottom line is: isolated first class constraints (primary or secondary or tertiary...) do not, in general, generate gauge transformations.
Don't believe the naysayers that say Keshe technology can't be done...there are plenty who have already done it! Look up Joseph Papp, Stanley Meyer, Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann, as examples of some of those who have worked with plasma or LENR.
Markets Insider: New TransUnion Digital Business Profile Gives Small Businesses a Simple, Cost-Effective Way to Connect with Customers
Inconsistent or inaccurate business information can confuse customers and lead to poor experiences. Digital Business Profile addresses this challenge by giving small business owners a centralized way ...
New TransUnion Digital Business Profile Gives Small Businesses a Simple, Cost-Effective Way to Connect with Customers
For any local business that qualifies, claiming your Google Business Profile is a must-do to help your business rank higher on Google. Regularly optimizing your business profile with content such as ...