The same style should be used throughout any article." "To indicate around, approximately, or about, the unitalicised abbreviation c. is preferred over circa, ca, ca., approximately, or approx., and should be spaced (c. 1291).
Internationalized versions of email programs typically translate "Re" to an abbreviation of the translation of "Reply". Nobody knows that "Re" means "Res", so it's useless to try to make your communication dependent on it. The original RFC 822 did not contain the specification of "Re", although it did show an example using it.
In my native language (Italian) there are convenient abbreviations for compare (cfr) and see or refer to (vd). Is there anything similar in English? Or should I just use the complete words see or r...
The strict definition for 'acronym' insists that the abbreviation has been accepted into the lexicon as an uncapitalised word in its own right, for example radar, laser and scuba, though many people consider all abbreviations pronounced as words, such as ISA and NATO, to be acronyms.
Is there a common abbreviation for "with or without"? e.g. w/wo or w/w/o Obviously, something this complex is best written in full form, but I'm looking for something to use in space constrained applications.
Is there a common abbreviation for "with or without"? e.g. w/wo or w/w/o
cf., an abbreviation for the Latin word confer (the imperative singular form of "conferre"), literally meaning "bring together", is used to refer to other material or ideas which may provide similar or different information or arguments. It is mainly used in scholarly contexts, such as in academic (mainly humanities, physics and biology) or legal texts. It is translated, and can be read aloud ...