IIRC @Valid isn't a Spring annotation but a JSR-303 annotation (which is the Bean Validation standard). What it does is it basically checks if the data that you send to the method is valid or not (it will validate the scriptFile for you).
@Valid annotation is commonly used within the Bean Validation API scope. It’s primarily employed to enable form validation or validation of model objects. //Below are my pojo classes public class ...
Here, @Valid is javax.validation.Valid, and @Validated is org.springframework.validation.annotation.Validated. The docs for the latter say Variant of JSR-303's Valid, supporting the specification of validation groups. Designed for convenient use with Spring's JSR-303 support but not JSR-303 specific. which doesn't help much because it doesn't tell exactly how it's different. If at all. Both ...
I would like to find a way to fix broken geometries in objects returned by rnaturalearth. This reprex demonstrates invalid geometries in Natural Earth datasets and explores potential solutions for ...
This is why you're getting the "Unexpected token '<'" error, because the HTML is not valid JSON. To fix this issue, you need to check what the server is sending back and make sure it's returning a JSON object.
Specifically, is the expression string_view{ nullptr, 0 } well-defined? The specification for this constructor under [string.view.cons] reads: Preconditions: [str, str + len) is a valid range. With that, another way of phrasing this question would be: Is [nullptr, nullptr) considered a "valid range" in C++?
c++ - Is string_view { nullptr, 0 } valid? - Stack Overflow
While it makes sense here to have answers that show problems caused by other kinds of valid syntax, this is an example where the version of Python used causes the syntax not to be valid. This question, fundamentally, is about code becoming invalid because of other parts of the code. Protected question.