Object-oriented programming (OOP) is a programming paradigm that uses "objects" – data structures consisting of data fields and methods together with their interactions – to design applications and computer programs. Programming techniques may include features such as data abstraction, encapsulation, modularity, polymorphism, and inheritance. It was not commonly used in mainstream software ...
1318 When do you choose functional programming over object oriented? When you anticipate a different kind of software evolution: Object-oriented languages are good when you have a fixed set of operations on things, and as your code evolves, you primarily add new things.
In several introductory texts on Object-oriented programming, I've come across the above statement. From wikipedia, "In OOP, each object is capable of receiving messages, processing data, and sen...
IMHO, object oriented programming is a concept that exists at a higher level of abstraction than procedural programming. The two are not mutually exclusive in that individual methods in an OO program look pretty much the same as individual functions in a procedural program.
You can use aspect-oriented programming in combination with functional programming, but also in combination with an object-oriented one. It is not "vs", it is "aspect-oriented programming with object-oriented programming". To me, AOP is some kind of "metaprogramming". Everything that AOP does could also be done without it by just adding more code.
I am new to programming and do not fully understand the difference between an object-oriented language and one that is procedural. What is the difference and what category does python fall under?
The question was about the differences between object oriented, functional, and procedural programming. While the languages mentioned in these answers certainly lend themselves to one of these approaches, the answer makes no mention of any of these concepts...